During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
The filings were released after D4vd's family were summoned by a California court to testify before the grand jury.
，推荐阅读51吃瓜获取更多信息
第五十八条 违反本法第十四条、第十五条、第十七条第三款和第四十四条第三款规定，制作、销售、提供、使用相关设备、软件、工具、服务的，由公安机关、网信部门、电信主管部门、市场监管部门等依据职责予以没收，处违法所得一倍以上十倍以下罚款，没有违法所得或者违法所得不足五万元的，处五十万元以下罚款；情节严重的，由公安机关并处十五日以下拘留。
Maintained by Dimitris Papailiopoulos (@dimitrispapail).